Biden powers to set US immigration policy scrutinised

Support migrant centric journalism today and donate

Amid efforts to scrap the controversial, Trump-era ‘Remain in Mexico’ program, President Joe Biden’s powers to set US immigration policy will be scrutinized by the Supreme Court. Launched in 2019, the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy allowed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to send certain immigrants who entered the US back to Mexico.


Returning people to Mexico was done instead of detaining them or releasing them into the US while their US immigration application was being processed. Critics of the policy have described it as ‘inhumane’ and argue that it exposes asylum seekers, with credible claims to remain in the US, to all sorts of dangers and squalid living conditions.

Migrants subjected to the Remain in Mexico policy – also known as Migrant Protection Protocols – have been forced to live in makeshift camps on the US-Mexico border. 


Title 42 policy

The Remain in Mexico policy is separate from another controversial Trump-era US immigration policy known as Title 42, which allows US border officials to deny US entry on the grounds of public health. Title 42 blocks migrants from seeking asylum entirely, unlike the Remain in Mexico policy, which still allows migrants an opportunity to apply for asylum in the US.

The Title 42 policy is currently facing separate legal challenges, but a federal judge recently blocked an attempt to end the legislation.

The political fallout over the Biden administration’s attempt to end the Title 42 policy has left the White House in a precarious position and demonstrates the uphill battle it faces in the courts to overturn a series of controversial, Trump-era US immigration policies.

While Biden has personally pledged to end the Remain in Mexico program, so far he has been stifled by federal courts.


President’s control over US immigration policy questioned

Continual knockbacks in the courts have raised serious questions over the US President’s control over US immigration policy and diplomatic relations with America’s neighbouring countries.

Last June, the Biden administration issued a memo terminating the Remain in Mexico policy. However, when the states of Texas and Missouri challenged the memo, a federal judge found in their favour and ordered that the policy be reinstated.

At the time, the federal court ruled that the administration had failed to explain its decision-making process when attempting to end the program in violation of the federal Administrative Procedure Act.

In a step further, the court interpreted US immigration law in a way that required the DHS to return certain non-citizens to Mexico when the department lacked adequate funds to detain them on US soil – despite a longstanding discretion that allowed US border officials to decide who to release and who to detain.


Further attempt failed

Last fall, the DHS again tried to terminate the Remain in Mexico policy, issuing a new memo that provided a more detailed explanation of its reasons for abolishing the program. However, an appeals court ultimately upheld the district court’s ruling, refusing to even take into consideration explanations provided in the new memo, suggesting that it had come too late.

According to the International Organization for Migration, as of April 17, more than 2,300 migrants have been sent back to Mexico under the Remain in Mexico policy since it was reinstated at the end of 2021. can help with US employment-based visas

If you would like to apply for a US work visa – including L1 visasE2 visasO1 visas and H1B visas - can help. is a specialist visa services firm with over thirty years of experience dealing with visa applications. We can help with a wide range of visa applications to your country of choice. Contact us for further details. You can also telephone 0344 991 9222.