A report by the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) found that immigrants increase the total economic output of the United States, are more innovative per capita than their native counterparts, and contribute over $30 billion in increased income for native-born American workers.
"That immigration has fueled U.S. macroeconomic growth is both uncontroversial and unsurprising - more total workers yield more total output," the report states.
<$adv0> According to the report, immigrants are innovative and create businesses at a rate estimated at 40% higher than the native-born population. The CEA also found that immigrants have a lower crime rate than natives and are much less likely to be incarcerated.
The CEA also stated that immigrants can fiscally benefit the U.S. government in the long run.
Citing a study by the National Research Council, the CEA said that immigrants were estimated to have a modest positive influence on fiscal activity by improving public budgets through taxes. According to the 1996 study, immigrants and their descendants contribute about $80,000 more in taxes than native-born Americans.
They also claimed that immigrants would slightly improve the solvency of programs such as Medicare and Social Security, both of which have been very problematic during Bush's presidency. The 'Baby Boomer' generation, due to start retiring in a few years, will put a significant strains on the programs.
Social Security isn't the only subject causing consternation for Bush's presidency. The whole issue of reforming U.S. immigration has been stalled - a much anticipated immigration reform bill recently floundered in the Senate when both Democrats and Republicans voted against moving the issue out of debate.
Senate leaders over the weekend are trying to get immigration reform back on track, but a significant coalition of right-wing interests are coordinating efforts to delay or kill the bill in its current form.
The paper was possibly prompted to assist the president's argument for immigration reform; the CEA stated that reducing immigration "would be a poorly-targeted and inefficient way to assist low-wage Americans."
Related:• Key proposals in US Senate immigration reform debate
• US Senate votes for 5-year limit on temp worker program
• US Senate announces proposal on immigration overhaul legislation
• United States sharply increases most immigration fees
• US census data reveals 16% immigration increase in 5 years
• US study - Immigrants probably don't take jobs from Americans
• Google says US should increase H-1B visa quota
• Greenspan says US needs to attract more skilled migrants
• California needs more skilled workers with advanced education
• Bush serious about immigration reform
• Bushs continuing attempts to change US immigration system
• Bush continues pushing US immigration reform