Table of Contents
- Heritage Foundation Takes Legal Action
- Questions Surrounding Prince Harry's US Visa
- Drug Use Disclosures on US Visa Applications
- Other Celebrity Cases
- Prince Harry's High Court Appearance
- The Heritage Foundation's Motivation
- Current Situation and Court Hearing Update
- Implications for the Royal Family
- Conclusion and Additional Information
Prince Harry's US visa has been a topic of discussion for many, even more so with the recent court hearing of 6 June. Questions surrounding his US visa application process and whether the US government ignored his drug-taking admissions have sparked widespread debate, with the right-wing Heritage Foundation taking a keen interest in the case. This comprehensive analysis delves into the situation surrounding Prince Harry's US visa, potential preferential treatment, the Heritage Foundation's motivations, and the implications for the royal family.
The Heritage Foundation, an American conservative political research group, has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to determine if proper rules were followed when granting Prince Harry his US visa. The case hinges on how the Duke of Sussex answered questions about drug-taking on his US visa form when he applied for a visa allowing him to move to America in March 2020.
In his Netflix series and memoir, Prince Harry admitted to having used cocaine, marijuana, and magic mushrooms. Under US law, admission of, or evidence of past drug use, can be grounds to reject a visa application.
Lawyers for the Heritage Foundation point to two key questions in the US DS160 visa form. The first asks: "Have you ever been a drug abuser or addict?" The second asks: "Have you ever violated, or engaged in a conspiracy to violate, any law relating to controlled substances?" If Prince Harry answered these questions truthfully, admitting his drug use, there's a possibility that his US visa application should have been rejected.
On the other hand, if he didn't disclose his drug use on the US visa form, there's a serious question as to whether proceedings should begin against him for providing false information.
In the case of Prince Harry, the public may find out if he either lied and claimed he had never taken drugs, or if he admitted taking them and the US government allowed him in anyway. The Heritage Foundation's counsel, Sam Dewey, told Sky News that they view it as a very serious question – why Prince Harry was let in, given everything known about his drug use.
As part of the evidence for the case, Heritage Foundation lawyers point to other celebrities, such as celebrity chef Nigella Lawson and musician Pete Doherty, who have in the past been denied visas or had the process delayed for previous drug use. In 2010, Doherty was allowed to fly to the US and arrived at JFK airport in New York before being sent back home on the next flight. Doherty has a string of drug convictions. In 2013, Lawson confessed in a court case related to two personal assistants that she had taken cocaine and marijuana. The following year, she was prevented from boarding a flight to Los Angeles, California. After a long process, she was eventually granted a visa.
In a stroke of legal coincidence, not only are there ongoing legal proceedings relating to Prince Harry in America, but on 6 June he also appeared in London's High Court in a "phone hacking" related court case. Lawyers for the Heritage Foundation are demanding the US government release the Duke of Sussex's US visa application form, a move which could result in his removal from the country.
The Heritage Foundation is a conservative American think tank that often holds the Biden administration to account. One strand of their work has been to question the Department of Homeland Security's work, including issues of visas and immigration. Prince Harry has provided the foundation with a perfect case study with which it hopes to argue that the DHS is not following procedure. By admitting publicly that he has taken drugs and found them to be a helpful "coping mechanism", the prince has allowed the Heritage Foundation to question why he was granted a visa.
A judge has given the US Customs and Border Protection Agency to determine how to respond to the Heritage Foundation's demands that Prince Harry's immigration records are released. Ultimately, the judge must rule on whether it is in the public interest to release Prince Harry's application form or parts of it.
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the royal family, particularly as Prince Harry's father is now King Charles III. If it is determined that Prince Harry received preferential treatment or provided false information on his US visa application, it could further tarnish the image of the British royal family.
The situation surrounding Prince Harry's US visa raises questions about potential preferential treatment and the motivations of the right-wing Heritage Foundation. Are US immigration laws on drug use too tough perhaps? Should people be excluded from the US for very minor drugs related offences?
Popular US Work Visa by workpermit.com: L1, H1B, E2, and O1 Visas
There are various types of US visas that individuals can apply for, depending on their circumstances. Some of the most common employment-based visas include:
L1 visa: This visa is for intracompany transferees who work in managerial or executive positions or have specialized knowledge.
H1B visa: This visa is for specialty occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise in specialized fields.
E2 visa: This visa is for investors who have made a significant investment in a US business and, management or essential skills employees. Only certain nationalities can apply.
O1 visa: This visa is for individuals with extraordinary abilities in the arts, sciences, education, business, or athletics.
Workpermit.com is a specialist visa services firm with over thirty years of experience dealing with visa applications. Contact us for further details. You can also telephone 0344 991 9222.