US immigration public charge rule reviewed by Supreme Court

Support migrant centric journalism today and donate

A controversial Trump-era US immigration policy is set to be reviewed by the Supreme Court. The public charge rule blocks immigrants from securing legal permanent residency in the United States if they are likely to rely on state benefits such as food stamps. The rule was brought back into effect in November 2020 having been blocked by a Chicago judge.


The Supreme Court has agreed to review the legality of the controversial US immigration policy, with new President Joe Biden expected to scrap the rule. Supreme Court justices said it would consider an appeal that argues that the Trump administration had violated federal US immigration and administrative law by imposing the rule.

The Trump administration expanded the definition of who could be considered a ‘public charge’, which greatly increased the number of immigrants who would be denied permanent residency in the US.


Hallmark of Trump presidency

Trump’s tough US visa and immigration rules were a hallmark of his time in office. The key issue concerning the public charge rule, stated in litigation filed in federal courts in Illinois and New York, is which immigrants are eligible for legal permanent residency – known as a US green card.

US immigration law has long permitted officials to deny people permanent residency if they are deemed ‘likely to become a public charge.’

Guidelines that have existed for 20 years state that: “Immigrants likely to become primarily dependent on direct cash assistance or long-term institutionalization, in a nursing home for example, at public expense will be blocked from obtaining permanent residency.”

Under Trump, the public charge rule was expanded to include a wider range of public benefits accessed for a period of 12 months over any 36-month period, such as the Medicaid healthcare program, housing and food support.


Rule blocked

The rule has been repeatedly blocked in recent years. In 2019, a federal judge blocked the rule for ‘likely violations of federal law’. In August 2020, the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the 2019 decision.

The same justices did not act in a separate dispute over the public charge rule, in which Cook County, Illinois, and an advocacy group sued in federal court in that state, and the Chicago-based 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an injunction as well in June 2020.

Judge at the time, Amy Coney Barrett – who is now a justice on the Supreme Court having been appointed by Trump prior to him leaving the White House – dissented from the 7th Circuit’s decision, finding that the government’s rule was a ‘reasonable interpretation of the public charge law.’

Despite the rule repeatedly being invalidated, with Courts in Chicago, New York and San Francisco ruling it to be unlawful, it remains in effect pending the final outcome of the cases, according to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.

However, it’s unlikely that a review of the public charge rule will take place before the fall and could be affected by Biden’s orders to reconsider the policy. can help with US employment-based visas

If you would like to apply for a US work visa – including L1 visasE2 visasO1 visas and H1B visas - can help. is a specialist visa services firm with over thirty years of experience dealing with visa applications. We can help with a wide range of visa applications to your country of choice. Contact us for further details. You can also telephone 0344 991 9222.